~
Interesting documentary by Brian Standing about how propaganda has been used for over 100 years by advanced "media" methods to sell ideas, concepts, habits and war, sometimes to make us believe in the rightness of wrong ideas, and even to believe that something exists that ain't necessarily so. It is really about illusions. If you have ever seen the movie "Wag The Dog" you understand what this is about.
Interview with Brian Standing here.
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Friday, May 13, 2011
The Truth About Bin Laden
~
~~~~~~~~
The Iconic Meeting - THE Picture. - Finally... R.I.P. O.B.L.
This is it. The Big Moment.
Really?...
We can't see a danged thing. But who cares what they're looking at? It's enough to know that we know what they're supposed to be looking at. Never mind that they might really be reacting to the news that the kitchen is serving gefilte fish for dinner.
 |
| We finally got him, Boss. And you can take that to the bank! |
~~~~~~~~
The Iconic Meeting - THE Picture. - Finally... R.I.P. O.B.L.
This is it. The Big Moment.
Really?...
We can't see a danged thing. But who cares what they're looking at? It's enough to know that we know what they're supposed to be looking at. Never mind that they might really be reacting to the news that the kitchen is serving gefilte fish for dinner.
Originally I decided that, since a picture is worth a thousand words, I would just publish the picture as it now is with Osama's face, laugh for a minute and then leave it, with the current headline. Nice idea, but only one thing wrong… or maybe two.
First, no sooner than I had published it and sent it out to some of my mailing list than someone wrote back immediately, asking "Where is the article? I want to know the truth about Bin Laden."
If this were a piece of fiction, the next line might be "and then I frowned..."
Maybe the picture wasn't obvious. I was trying to be clever and hide the picture's obvious joke in plain sight. Maybe I succeeded too well. I thought it was overtly obvious, and still do. So I did the most reasonable thing I could think of. I wrote back to the mailing recipient and replied, "It's a joke. Look at the picture again." I didn't hear back, so...
Second, I realized soon afterward that I was not the only one in the world who had the idea. I've seen three or four copies of the same picture, only with Bin Laden in different places, and many more with completely different happenings going on. Everyone has the same idea; not many are fooled by this picture. And some of them are hilarious. Others are pretty dull. Mine is...well, of course, great. And appropriately tongue-in-cheek. I wasn't going for the knee-slap joke. How could I, with one of the most published and iconic photos in the last two weeks? And not even my picture. But since the world perception is that it was a staged picture, and that the White House is still insisting this event is real, that this picture is genuine, (and "real-time" at that), it is inevitable that a slew of "roasts" would follow. Mine is one of them.
I thought of having Bin Laden wear a white cloak as he does (excuse me, did…rip) in several pictures. My original idea was to fit only his head in the shot, originally on Obama's body. It was okay, but not great. It was clever but not funny. I thought of Joe Biden next, but I couldn't do it. Biden's great bloodhound expression is too priceless to cover over. If there was ever a bored expression, Joe's got it, and it tells volumes about the actual meeting, as far as I'm concerned. Perhaps they did too many takes and Joe's starting to nod off...
I then selected Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Osama’s face fit perfectly over Mullen’s, and I loved Osama’s turbaned face with Mullen’s brown shirt and tie, as if Osama was some computer programmer down the hall who happened to be in on the meeting. In light of well-known knowledge that Osama was once working for the CIA, the picture as it stands seemed to make the point well. So I left it as is. There are many other similar spoofs, to be sure.
But of course I happen to like mine the best.
~~~~~
For those who absolutely must know:
The Situation Room of the White House, May 1, 2011 .
Seated, from left to right, are:
- Vice President Biden,
- President Obama,
- Brigadier General Marshall B. “Brad” Webb, Assistant Commanding General, Joint Special Operations Command;
- Denis McDonough, Deputy National Security Advisor;
- Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State;
- Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense.
- Osama Bin Laden, (Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff;)
- Tom Donilon, National Security Advisor ;
- Bill Daley, Chief of Staff;
- Tony Blinken, National Security Advisor to the Vice President;
- Audrey Tomason, Director for Counterterrorism;
- a person in a beige shirt;
- John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism;
- James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence; and
- a person in a black suit with a white tie.
Note: a classified document seen in this photograph has been obscured.
(I am curious about the pictures on Hillary’s computer)
~
Sunday, May 8, 2011
The Dearth of Bin Laden
~
Sunday, May 01, 2011
There is an old Simpsons episode in which the town of Springfield is threatened by an approaching asteroid. (Bart’s Comet) When the danger has passed, and the comet burns up in the atmosphere to the size of a Chihuahua’s head and rolls to the feet of Homer Simpson, who naively predicted that this is what would happen, Moe shouts out to the mob, “Let’s burn down the Observatory so this will never happen again!”
~
In March 2011 the world was threatened by a Tsunami of water from an M 9.0 earthquake, surrounding Japan.
In May 2011 the world was threatened by a Tsunami of lies from an M 10.0 Media quake, surrounding the death of Bin Laden.
Most of the world media, lacking any journalistic integrity or responsibility, accepted this absurd story and hopped all over it - to use a cliché - like fleas on a dog, as the Presidential-Military spin machine knew they would. They knew the world media weren’t going to let this one get away, not THE top story of the last ten years, bigger even than the election of the first U.S. black president. Even bigger... Dare I say it?...than media coverage of 911 itself?
The two go so hand in hand, that, theoretically, you cannot have one without the other. And yet the events of 911 are being paid mere lip service. Bin Laden, the guy who “planned" and "caused” 911, according to ten years of compounded media spin, is dead. Finally. Great. About time. He’s dead, and in the eyes of the world that is what really counts, that he's dead. He's Dead. Dead. Dead. Understand?
According to media spin official reports, he was with his 5th wife Fatah and some old cave friends in an unidentified “compound” in Pakistan. Apparently they were watching old videos of Osama's glory days. Navy SEALS “somehow” got the right Intel, after only 10 years, and invaded the compound, er, apartment building. They knew right where to go because the TV was too loud, and because everyone started laughing when they saw the video of Osama shooting an AK-47 and turning to ask a compatriot, "Do you have anything smaller?" Unarmed, Osama tried to defend himself by using his dialysis machine as a shield. When that didn’t work, he then hid behind Fatah, and whoever else he could get to stand in front of him, but thanks to Navy SEAL Team 6 marksmanship, they only shot his wife in the leg, but managed to get Osama neatly in the left eye.
Er, neatly? Actually, he was quite a mess after several photoshopped layers were added to a youthful 1998 picture of him and, officially sanctioned by the U.S., placed on the internet. No doubt his wife Fatah will now have a clean guest spot on Oprah's TV network, as long as Osama, er, I mean Obama, is not on the same show. Rumor has it O may endorse Fatah for a Presidential run in 2016, but of course that's only a rumor...and it may be dependent on her first appearing nude for Playboy. (I mean Fatah, not O)
When the world discovered the photos were bogus, the U.S. took away the photos’ officialdom and cursed the unknown fakers responsible for publishing them, vowing instead to never release the “real” photos because they are too horrible to look at, more horrible than the pictures of depleted uranium Iraqi victims that the U.S. has willingly released from time to time in the past to garner support for the war(s).
More horrible than Hiroshima survivor pictures.
More horrible than Hillary Clinton pictures...
Rather than sticking Obama’s head on a pike, (sorry - I mean Osama) and then drawing and quartering his body and sowing it with lime, (I still mean Osama) and then feeding it to the seals - I mean pigs - the SEALS instead, out of “deep respect” for traditional Islam funeral rites, buried him at sea.
Yes, I’m still referring to Osama.
Burial at sea goes against Islam practice, but what the heck? It’s clean. It’s respectful. It leaves no tracks. Osama sleeps with the fishes. Dead men, buried at sea, tell no tales. And besides, it’s Obama’s and the military’s way of not disrespecting Osama. Whatever they do, they certainly don't want to "dis" Osama bin Laden. Nor does our Presidential-Military-Spin (PMS) want to give Islam a bad name. They know that wouldn't be right.
And, just to make sure they were killing the right guy, after they killed whoever it was, since they weren’t really sure beforehand, the SEALS established Osama’s official “identity” with DNA testing, and in record time, unbelievable!, a matter of minutes apparently, but now they, I mean "he," won’t divulge the tests due to national security. (I mean Obama now, not the SEALS).
But a thought occurred to me. What if they had been wrong? Shouldn’t they have done the DNA test first, since a DNA test can now be applied so quickly? Couldn't they just hold a gun on Osama, shout the Arabic word for "Freeze!", take the DNA test, get the results, wait for pink to turn blue, then Bing Badda Boom?
Well, after all is said and done, now they won’t show the video! Every SEAL had a nice new Best Buy cam strapped to his helmet. And they can't show us a decent picture of the action? Jeez! I mean, we've seen plenty of blood and guts before on CSI and Dexter. Couldn’t they have at least shown us a nice last picture of Obama sitting there in the living room in front of his TV and his dialysis machine, with his hands raised, just before they killed him?
Sorry. I still mean Osama. (I don't know why I keep doing that!)
The more I hear this story in the “news”. The more I get the image of a child who has told a lie, and is now desperately adding to the lie to keep from getting caught. (You know, I think that would make a good story. If only I had a title...)
The lie keeps getting bigger and bigger, and more uncontrollable. Eventually it will point directly back to the U.S. And also to Israel. And if you think Israel is going to accept the blame, think again.
If you think the U.S. is going to take the blame…well, let me rephrase that.
If you think Obama ( and I do mean Obama this time ) is going to take the blame, think again. From now on, it’s either:
1. Keep trying to prove the Bin Laden lie, or
2. If the lie busts, then Save the President and prove plausible deniability, or
3. Try to keep the lie going at least until after the 2012 election
Foreseeable problems with these:
1. Proving the lie will prove to be too complex, involving too many people, too many disappearances, too many assassinations, etc. The internet is letting everyone know what is going on these days, for anyone who cares to look deeper than Fox or CNN. You cannot hide from the internet anymore and you cannot shut it down for good. From now on the truth will always emerge in some guise. More and more, people are seeing that the emperor has no clothes.
2. Saving the President is too cumbersome. No one accepts Plausible Deniability anymore. Therefore, heads will roll. Too many heads will roll. Remember Nixon and Watergate. Nixon loyalty dwindled sharply after his resignation and one major whistleblower named John Dean. Again, more and more, people are seeing that the emperor has no clothes.
3. This third choice will happen regardless of #1 or #2.
The Pentagon is releasing information and videos, showing everything but the truth of the matter. They expect the people to swallow this tripe, and the sad fact is, for now most people are swallowing happily, if mainstream TV news is to be believed. There are a lot of vindictive comments expressing angry joy and joyful spite that bin Laden is “finally” dead, never mind all the suppressed evidence that points to the likelihood that he died in 2001.
The whole message of this “breaking” story is to celebrate Barak Obama’s “leadership” and get people scared about Al Queda once again, instead of trying to fix:
· radiation from Japan
· poisoned Gulf waters
· increasing wars
· increasing debt
· America’s downward slide
. Dancing With The Stars
It is also about:
· justifying the last ten years of murderous foreign policies created since 911
· justifying policies of interrogation, rendition, imprisonment
· letting people know that the New World Order (NWO) is here
· creating the illusion that something has finally been accomplished in the last ten years
· setting the stage for another terror attack, the next stage in the NWO
· a false flag operation in the guise of a false victory, no less so than flight-suited George Bush’s “Mission Accomplished” fiasco.
It is not real. Nothing is changed.
In spite of Bin Laden's "death", remember this:
· The price of gas is not going down (ok,, maybe just for a few weeks)
· The price of food is not going down
· The quality of food is certainly going down
· The world population is certainly going up
. "They" want the world population to go down, way down
· Inflation is not going down
. Oliver Stone will never get any history right, and hopefully will never do the movie version of "Laden"
If there is any good news about the death of Bin Laden, it is this: The internet and mainstream news is abuzz with bin Laden stories. All over the world more people are waking up and questioning the story. Maybe the majority have not yet reached a decision, are just shaking off their groggy sleep. Perhaps the majority still believes that it was really bin Laden who died the other day. But those in the know who have been following the story since 2001 know the truth, and are spreading the word. And the truth shall indeed set everyone free. In this case, the truth is that the liars have become more glaringly obvious than ever before in history. The more lies they conjure up to cover up their previous lies only digs them a deeper grave.
The deceivers have indeed deceived themselves to think they can continue to pull off this charade.
Far easier to sell a TV comedy series called My Five Wives.
See my related humorous post here:
~
Sunday, May 01, 2011
There is an old Simpsons episode in which the town of Springfield is threatened by an approaching asteroid. (Bart’s Comet) When the danger has passed, and the comet burns up in the atmosphere to the size of a Chihuahua’s head and rolls to the feet of Homer Simpson, who naively predicted that this is what would happen, Moe shouts out to the mob, “Let’s burn down the Observatory so this will never happen again!”
~
In March 2011 the world was threatened by a Tsunami of water from an M 9.0 earthquake, surrounding Japan.
In May 2011 the world was threatened by a Tsunami of lies from an M 10.0 Media quake, surrounding the death of Bin Laden.
 |
| Osama... We Hardly Knew Ye... |
The two go so hand in hand, that, theoretically, you cannot have one without the other. And yet the events of 911 are being paid mere lip service. Bin Laden, the guy who “planned" and "caused” 911, according to ten years of compounded media spin, is dead. Finally. Great. About time. He’s dead, and in the eyes of the world that is what really counts, that he's dead. He's Dead. Dead. Dead. Understand?
 |
| What was 911 about again? Jeez, it was so long ago... Oh yeah, two buildings falling in NYC. What? Three buildings? Really? Goddam that Osama! Why somebody oughta… Oh, we did? Just now?!! But you said that guy was an actor...er, never mind... |
According to media spin official reports, he was with his 5th wife Fatah and some old cave friends in an unidentified “compound” in Pakistan. Apparently they were watching old videos of Osama's glory days. Navy SEALS “somehow” got the right Intel, after only 10 years, and invaded the compound, er, apartment building. They knew right where to go because the TV was too loud, and because everyone started laughing when they saw the video of Osama shooting an AK-47 and turning to ask a compatriot, "Do you have anything smaller?" Unarmed, Osama tried to defend himself by using his dialysis machine as a shield. When that didn’t work, he then hid behind Fatah, and whoever else he could get to stand in front of him, but thanks to Navy SEAL Team 6 marksmanship, they only shot his wife in the leg, but managed to get Osama neatly in the left eye.
Er, neatly? Actually, he was quite a mess after several photoshopped layers were added to a youthful 1998 picture of him and, officially sanctioned by the U.S., placed on the internet. No doubt his wife Fatah will now have a clean guest spot on Oprah's TV network, as long as Osama, er, I mean Obama, is not on the same show. Rumor has it O may endorse Fatah for a Presidential run in 2016, but of course that's only a rumor...and it may be dependent on her first appearing nude for Playboy. (I mean Fatah, not O)
When the world discovered the photos were bogus, the U.S. took away the photos’ officialdom and cursed the unknown fakers responsible for publishing them, vowing instead to never release the “real” photos because they are too horrible to look at, more horrible than the pictures of depleted uranium Iraqi victims that the U.S. has willingly released from time to time in the past to garner support for the war(s).
More horrible than Hiroshima survivor pictures.
Rather than sticking Obama’s head on a pike, (sorry - I mean Osama) and then drawing and quartering his body and sowing it with lime, (I still mean Osama) and then feeding it to the seals - I mean pigs - the SEALS instead, out of “deep respect” for traditional Islam funeral rites, buried him at sea.
Yes, I’m still referring to Osama.
Burial at sea goes against Islam practice, but what the heck? It’s clean. It’s respectful. It leaves no tracks. Osama sleeps with the fishes. Dead men, buried at sea, tell no tales. And besides, it’s Obama’s and the military’s way of not disrespecting Osama. Whatever they do, they certainly don't want to "dis" Osama bin Laden. Nor does our Presidential-Military-Spin (PMS) want to give Islam a bad name. They know that wouldn't be right.
And, just to make sure they were killing the right guy, after they killed whoever it was, since they weren’t really sure beforehand, the SEALS established Osama’s official “identity” with DNA testing, and in record time, unbelievable!, a matter of minutes apparently, but now they, I mean "he," won’t divulge the tests due to national security. (I mean Obama now, not the SEALS).
But a thought occurred to me. What if they had been wrong? Shouldn’t they have done the DNA test first, since a DNA test can now be applied so quickly? Couldn't they just hold a gun on Osama, shout the Arabic word for "Freeze!", take the DNA test, get the results, wait for pink to turn blue, then Bing Badda Boom?
Well, after all is said and done, now they won’t show the video! Every SEAL had a nice new Best Buy cam strapped to his helmet. And they can't show us a decent picture of the action? Jeez! I mean, we've seen plenty of blood and guts before on CSI and Dexter. Couldn’t they have at least shown us a nice last picture of Obama sitting there in the living room in front of his TV and his dialysis machine, with his hands raised, just before they killed him?
Sorry. I still mean Osama. (I don't know why I keep doing that!)
 |
| Honest! I'm not lying... I'm just a puppet. |
The more I hear this story in the “news”. The more I get the image of a child who has told a lie, and is now desperately adding to the lie to keep from getting caught. (You know, I think that would make a good story. If only I had a title...)
The lie keeps getting bigger and bigger, and more uncontrollable. Eventually it will point directly back to the U.S. And also to Israel. And if you think Israel is going to accept the blame, think again.
 |
| Mr. President! Team 6 is just about to...Eew! Awright, who cut the cheese?... Joe?...Hillary?... |
If you think the U.S. is going to take the blame…well, let me rephrase that.
If you think Obama ( and I do mean Obama this time ) is going to take the blame, think again. From now on, it’s either:
1. Keep trying to prove the Bin Laden lie, or
2. If the lie busts, then Save the President and prove plausible deniability, or
3. Try to keep the lie going at least until after the 2012 election
Foreseeable problems with these:
1. Proving the lie will prove to be too complex, involving too many people, too many disappearances, too many assassinations, etc. The internet is letting everyone know what is going on these days, for anyone who cares to look deeper than Fox or CNN. You cannot hide from the internet anymore and you cannot shut it down for good. From now on the truth will always emerge in some guise. More and more, people are seeing that the emperor has no clothes.
2. Saving the President is too cumbersome. No one accepts Plausible Deniability anymore. Therefore, heads will roll. Too many heads will roll. Remember Nixon and Watergate. Nixon loyalty dwindled sharply after his resignation and one major whistleblower named John Dean. Again, more and more, people are seeing that the emperor has no clothes.
3. This third choice will happen regardless of #1 or #2.
The Pentagon is releasing information and videos, showing everything but the truth of the matter. They expect the people to swallow this tripe, and the sad fact is, for now most people are swallowing happily, if mainstream TV news is to be believed. There are a lot of vindictive comments expressing angry joy and joyful spite that bin Laden is “finally” dead, never mind all the suppressed evidence that points to the likelihood that he died in 2001.
The whole message of this “breaking” story is to celebrate Barak Obama’s “leadership” and get people scared about Al Queda once again, instead of trying to fix:
· radiation from Japan
· poisoned Gulf waters
· increasing wars
· increasing debt
· America’s downward slide
. Dancing With The Stars
It is also about:
· justifying the last ten years of murderous foreign policies created since 911
· justifying policies of interrogation, rendition, imprisonment
· letting people know that the New World Order (NWO) is here
· creating the illusion that something has finally been accomplished in the last ten years
· setting the stage for another terror attack, the next stage in the NWO
· a false flag operation in the guise of a false victory, no less so than flight-suited George Bush’s “Mission Accomplished” fiasco.
It is not real. Nothing is changed.
In spite of Bin Laden's "death", remember this:
· The price of gas is not going down (ok,, maybe just for a few weeks)
· The price of food is not going down
· The quality of food is certainly going down
· The world population is certainly going up
. "They" want the world population to go down, way down
· Inflation is not going down
. Oliver Stone will never get any history right, and hopefully will never do the movie version of "Laden"
If there is any good news about the death of Bin Laden, it is this: The internet and mainstream news is abuzz with bin Laden stories. All over the world more people are waking up and questioning the story. Maybe the majority have not yet reached a decision, are just shaking off their groggy sleep. Perhaps the majority still believes that it was really bin Laden who died the other day. But those in the know who have been following the story since 2001 know the truth, and are spreading the word. And the truth shall indeed set everyone free. In this case, the truth is that the liars have become more glaringly obvious than ever before in history. The more lies they conjure up to cover up their previous lies only digs them a deeper grave.
The deceivers have indeed deceived themselves to think they can continue to pull off this charade.
Far easier to sell a TV comedy series called My Five Wives.
See my related humorous post here:
~
Friday, May 6, 2011
Return Dept.
The Return of…
Douglas MacArthur
 |
| "I Shall Return" |
Arnold...
 |
| I'll Be Back!... |
Ozombie Bin Laden
 | ||
| "Arrgghh!..." (Zombiespeak for: "I am coming back to devour all of your flesh blessings be upon you all...") |
General Petraeus
 |
| Get your hands off me!! You can't handle the truth!! Bin Laden is still alive, I tell ya!! We gotta stop him before he kills again !! You're next!!... |
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Obama-Osama: Your Daily Psy Op
~
I am working on my own article about Osama and Obama, and the strange inconsistencies found in the circumstances around the birth of one, and the death of the other. But for now, Mr. Nilsen says it all very well.
by K.R. Nilsen
(for henrymakow.com)
On May 1. 2011, to the day exactly 235 years after the founding of Illuminate, US president Obama proudly announced that the US military had killed the "most wanted terrorist" in the world, Osama Bin Laden. And after this crime, where a man was apparently sentenced and murdered without any trial whatsoever, people all over the world are rejoicing and dancing in the streets!
Amazing - a tasteless and morbid celebration of murder on Illuminati day, exactly according the spirit of that organization.
There are, however, a couple more points that make all of this smell even more:
1. Funny that this happens right at the time where the birth certificate controversy is at its highest. What greater diversion could have been cooked up, than this? President Obama is apparently a very "lucky" guy, and the timing is just perfect.
2. Bin Laden was hastily buried, on the grounds that the US military had such a great respect for Islamic burial traditions. However, this did not apply when Saddam's sons were killed: they were kept for 11 days before burial, and displayed for all the world to see. And we all know about the tendency of great warlords, to put their captives and causalities in public display, for gathering whatever "honor" the masses can give them. You tell me that the US military/government has no such tendency anymore?
3. Now if the US military was so keen to observe Islamic burial traditions, why then did they allegedly bury Bin Laden at sea, when this is strictly prohibited in Islamic tradition? You tell me they respected one part of the tradition so much that they had to break another part of the same tradition? How stupid can these people possibly think that we are?
4. In no culture in this world is it preferred to bury people at sea. Everybody intuitively knows that having someone buried in the ground, is the preferred option. Why, because we then know where they are, of course. And more important: we know they are dead, leaving no room for uncertainty whatsoever. And with uncertainty gone, the eventual process of grief can then start with its healing effects. Bottom line is that the US military command perfectly knew and understood that burying the guy at sea was not in accord with any tradition whatsoever, and would provoke reactions and tough questions. There absolutely has to be some other reason for doing this. What could that possibly be...?
5. Of course the US military and the White House is now being challenged on whether they really killed Bin Laden on May 1. John Brennan, Barack Obama's counter-terrorism adviser said: "We are going to do everything we can to make sure that nobody has any basis to try to deny that we got Osama bin Laden."
Sorry guys, too late. If you really meant what you said here, why dump the guy at sea, effectively abandoning the only real evidence that could convince the skeptics: a dead body.
6. We then have the congressional statements of various CIA people that Bin Laden was killed in late 2001 or early 2002. This also coincides with the fact that the US hunt for Bin Laden was dramatically reduced after 2002. From regarding him as the "number one priority", president Bush Jr. later claimed that he "did not care" at all where Bin Laden was. What an incredible 180 degree turnaround regarding the so-called "world's most wanted man"! There can be only one reason for this change of attitude.
7. The US military command well knows that doing their thing this way, is going to provoke a lot of contention. Some will come from the Islamic parts of the world, but the heaviest allegations are going to be domestic, splitting the US population even more. The timing is perfect too, as the critique of president Obama is mounting. Just another example of the Illuminati strategy of divide-and-conquer, further dividing the US of A. All of this is probably done to make the "conspiracy theorists", meaning anyone not buying what the powers-that-be declare in their ex-cathedra statements as pure and unadulterated truth, look really stupid. Yet another attack on anyone trying to think for themselves.
Without a body, this issue will obviously never go to rest, but rather separate the population further into "trusters" and "skeptics" regarding the US government. Further, Bin Laden was allegedly executed on May 1., the same date as Illuminate was founded on, in 1776. Hey, what an interesting coincidence - how strange indeed! All of this is going to feed endless speculation and contention, and in reality we have yet another 9/11 to think about now, instead of a resolve of the original one as allegedly intended.
The crazy thing about all of this, is that the guy has probably been dead for almost 10 years already. Seems like some people are kind of hard to kill, especially the ones created by the CIA and the US military to be scapegoats in their own evil schemes.
With Bin Laden officially gone, who is now going to be the new scapegoat? Take your pick, but I'll put my 5 cents on a US domestic group: big-government skeptics in general, and "conspiracy theorists" in particular. Chances are, there has now been a sea change - better get ready for some action.
~
Kaj Nilsen is a 42 y.o. computer programmer & information analyst, from Norway. He is working on a book dedicated to cracking the number 7 code of the Bible & its prophecies.
I am working on my own article about Osama and Obama, and the strange inconsistencies found in the circumstances around the birth of one, and the death of the other. But for now, Mr. Nilsen says it all very well.
by K.R. Nilsen
(for henrymakow.com)
On May 1. 2011, to the day exactly 235 years after the founding of Illuminate, US president Obama proudly announced that the US military had killed the "most wanted terrorist" in the world, Osama Bin Laden. And after this crime, where a man was apparently sentenced and murdered without any trial whatsoever, people all over the world are rejoicing and dancing in the streets!
Amazing - a tasteless and morbid celebration of murder on Illuminati day, exactly according the spirit of that organization.
There are, however, a couple more points that make all of this smell even more:
 |
| Hmm - Osama... and Obama... Hey, they rhyme! Are we related? |
1. Funny that this happens right at the time where the birth certificate controversy is at its highest. What greater diversion could have been cooked up, than this? President Obama is apparently a very "lucky" guy, and the timing is just perfect.
2. Bin Laden was hastily buried, on the grounds that the US military had such a great respect for Islamic burial traditions. However, this did not apply when Saddam's sons were killed: they were kept for 11 days before burial, and displayed for all the world to see. And we all know about the tendency of great warlords, to put their captives and causalities in public display, for gathering whatever "honor" the masses can give them. You tell me that the US military/government has no such tendency anymore?
3. Now if the US military was so keen to observe Islamic burial traditions, why then did they allegedly bury Bin Laden at sea, when this is strictly prohibited in Islamic tradition? You tell me they respected one part of the tradition so much that they had to break another part of the same tradition? How stupid can these people possibly think that we are?
4. In no culture in this world is it preferred to bury people at sea. Everybody intuitively knows that having someone buried in the ground, is the preferred option. Why, because we then know where they are, of course. And more important: we know they are dead, leaving no room for uncertainty whatsoever. And with uncertainty gone, the eventual process of grief can then start with its healing effects. Bottom line is that the US military command perfectly knew and understood that burying the guy at sea was not in accord with any tradition whatsoever, and would provoke reactions and tough questions. There absolutely has to be some other reason for doing this. What could that possibly be...?
5. Of course the US military and the White House is now being challenged on whether they really killed Bin Laden on May 1. John Brennan, Barack Obama's counter-terrorism adviser said: "We are going to do everything we can to make sure that nobody has any basis to try to deny that we got Osama bin Laden."
Sorry guys, too late. If you really meant what you said here, why dump the guy at sea, effectively abandoning the only real evidence that could convince the skeptics: a dead body.
6. We then have the congressional statements of various CIA people that Bin Laden was killed in late 2001 or early 2002. This also coincides with the fact that the US hunt for Bin Laden was dramatically reduced after 2002. From regarding him as the "number one priority", president Bush Jr. later claimed that he "did not care" at all where Bin Laden was. What an incredible 180 degree turnaround regarding the so-called "world's most wanted man"! There can be only one reason for this change of attitude.
7. The US military command well knows that doing their thing this way, is going to provoke a lot of contention. Some will come from the Islamic parts of the world, but the heaviest allegations are going to be domestic, splitting the US population even more. The timing is perfect too, as the critique of president Obama is mounting. Just another example of the Illuminati strategy of divide-and-conquer, further dividing the US of A. All of this is probably done to make the "conspiracy theorists", meaning anyone not buying what the powers-that-be declare in their ex-cathedra statements as pure and unadulterated truth, look really stupid. Yet another attack on anyone trying to think for themselves.
Without a body, this issue will obviously never go to rest, but rather separate the population further into "trusters" and "skeptics" regarding the US government. Further, Bin Laden was allegedly executed on May 1., the same date as Illuminate was founded on, in 1776. Hey, what an interesting coincidence - how strange indeed! All of this is going to feed endless speculation and contention, and in reality we have yet another 9/11 to think about now, instead of a resolve of the original one as allegedly intended.
The crazy thing about all of this, is that the guy has probably been dead for almost 10 years already. Seems like some people are kind of hard to kill, especially the ones created by the CIA and the US military to be scapegoats in their own evil schemes.
With Bin Laden officially gone, who is now going to be the new scapegoat? Take your pick, but I'll put my 5 cents on a US domestic group: big-government skeptics in general, and "conspiracy theorists" in particular. Chances are, there has now been a sea change - better get ready for some action.
~
Kaj Nilsen is a 42 y.o. computer programmer & information analyst, from Norway. He is working on a book dedicated to cracking the number 7 code of the Bible & its prophecies.
Benazir Bhutto - Osama Bin Laden was murdered (but not in 2011)
~
Benazir Bhutto - Osama Bin Laden was murdered (?)
In a November 2, 2007 interview, less than two months before she would be assassinated, Benazir Bhutto was asked by reporter David Frost of Al-Jazeera English about a letter that she had sent to Pakistani dictator Pervez Musharraf. The letter outlined who she believed should be investigated in the event of her assassination. While giving her answer, she listed as one of the suspects a "key figure in security... a former military officer in Pakistan" who had dealings with, among others, "Omar Sheikh, the man who murdered Osama bin-Laden."
read more...
Longer version below.
and for a counter point: (from representativepress - not sure who this is)
("...she meant to say Daniel Pearl, not Osama Bin Laden...")
(Of course, anyone could make that mistake...)
~
Benazir Bhutto - Osama Bin Laden was murdered (?)
In a November 2, 2007 interview, less than two months before she would be assassinated, Benazir Bhutto was asked by reporter David Frost of Al-Jazeera English about a letter that she had sent to Pakistani dictator Pervez Musharraf. The letter outlined who she believed should be investigated in the event of her assassination. While giving her answer, she listed as one of the suspects a "key figure in security... a former military officer in Pakistan" who had dealings with, among others, "Omar Sheikh, the man who murdered Osama bin-Laden."
read more...
Longer version below.
and for a counter point: (from representativepress - not sure who this is)
("...she meant to say Daniel Pearl, not Osama Bin Laden...")
(Of course, anyone could make that mistake...)
~
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)